by Lucy » Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:06 am
Dear Rainman,
it's really useful to hear what you found out about Pauline's cancer and the possibilities there were, particularly regarding OC. How unlucky, if she had both going on at the same time - too much for most people's immune system to fight, I'd imagine.
What I've heard about ipilimumab is pretty good, but the response rate you mentioned (20-30%) sounds quite high, compared to what I have read - maybe this includes partial responses rather than complete (when the cancer just reduces a bit, or becomes stable for a while, rather than goes away completely)
I don't know - but what I feel surer and surer about is that some of these melanomas are vicious, and once they have begun to travel, there's almost literally nothing that can stop them.
They are working on a few new treatments such as Braf targetted gene therapy, which can hold it back for a while - but it's still in erly stages of development and it isn't holding out for very long in a lot of patients.
What I'm trying, badly, to say, is that there is probably nothing you could actually have done to save Pauline - and the same goes for her doctors.
Kate's melanoma was on her head, which is a prime bad place as it's s active in terms of vascular and neural activity - tends to have a worse outcome - and though it was misdiagnosed for a year, before it went mad and she got a diagnosis, I now feel grateful for this.
That might sound very strange, but given its location and aggressiveness, it was never going to be stoppable. I'm therefore glad she had that extra year of thinking she was well, rather than having an early diagnosis followed by aggressive treatments which in the end wouldnt have worked.
Hope this helps a little bit - I also hope you are doing alright, as much as you can be at the moment, because it's obviously a horrible time for you.
again I am so sorry. Melanoma is a bastard.
Love
Lucy